Laaltain

Terror Suspect? A Pakistani Student Held by the Chinese Police

30 جون، 2014

A Pak­istani stu­dent in Chi­na was detained and inter­ro­gat­ed on sus­pi­cion of ter­ror by the Chi­nese police ear­li­er this month. Jamal was study­ing on schol­ar­ship at Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Uni­ver­si­ty of Chi­na, one of China’s lead­ing uni­ver­si­ties with the top rank­ing in media edu­ca­tion.

Chi­na leads the world in inter­net sur­veil­lance. The major inter­net web­sites includ­ing Google, Face­book and Twit­ter are also banned in Chi­na.

The whole fias­co was based on some banal joke about Jihad that Jamal made with his friends in an online pri­vate chat. Speak­ing to The Laal­tain, Jamal told that ear­li­er in June he was called by the uni­ver­si­ty offi­cials regard­ing some offi­cial mat­ter. Upon reach­ing the venue, he was tricked by the offi­cials and hand­ed over to the police. The police, includ­ing offi­cers from China’s noto­ri­ous Spe­cial Weapons & Tac­tics Unit (SWAT), and oth­er offi­cials harassed and inter­ro­gat­ed him for hours. It was after quite some time that the police actu­al­ly told him the rea­son for his deten­tion. He was hand­ed over long excerpts of his inter­net chat, all in Chi­nese, that Jamal was unable to read. Final­ly he was made to sign a doc­u­ment in Chi­nese that again he could not under­stand, and released with a warn­ing.
Upset over what he had to go through, Jamal com­ment­ed, “They treat­ed me inhu­man­ly, bul­lied me and ter­ror­ized me. I was not giv­en a right to defend myself. This is a vio­la­tion of my human rights and total­ly unjus­ti­fied.” Despite being angry, Jamal is not will­ing to take some reme­di­al step owing to the strict nature of the Chi­nese sys­tem which he has wit­nessed very close­ly for about two years. Along with the bru­tal polic­ing, Chi­na leads the world in inter­net sur­veil­lance. The major inter­net web­sites includ­ing Google, Face­book and Twit­ter are also banned in Chi­na. Fac­ing trou­bles in places like Xin­ji­nag, Chi­na uses the sur­veil­lance sys­tem most aggres­sive­ly.
Upon ask­ing about the con­tent of the dis­put­ed chat, Jamal, a sec­u­lar activist him­self, retort­ed, “I do not believe in Jihad. Such con­cepts have noth­ing to do with me.”
*The name has been changed to pro­tect iden­ti­ty of the stu­dent

2 Responses

  1. I blame the school for its trick­ery. They were sup­posed to pro­tect the stu­dent, but did not.

  2. if Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Uni­ver­si­ty of Chi­na had to lie to the stu­dent, it shows their incom­pe­tence. They should have pro­tect­ed the stu­dent, their behav­ior con­cern­ing this was extreme­ly irre­spon­si­ble on their part, they should have at least informed him of the con­fronta­tion and told him what rights he has, as an inter­na­tion­al stu­dent under their school, dur­ing such a sit­u­a­tion. They are clear­ly not com­pe­tent enough to even have inter­na­tion­al stu­dents at their school.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Responses

  1. I blame the school for its trick­ery. They were sup­posed to pro­tect the stu­dent, but did not.

  2. if Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Uni­ver­si­ty of Chi­na had to lie to the stu­dent, it shows their incom­pe­tence. They should have pro­tect­ed the stu­dent, their behav­ior con­cern­ing this was extreme­ly irre­spon­si­ble on their part, they should have at least informed him of the con­fronta­tion and told him what rights he has, as an inter­na­tion­al stu­dent under their school, dur­ing such a sit­u­a­tion. They are clear­ly not com­pe­tent enough to even have inter­na­tion­al stu­dents at their school.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *