Laaltain

The Gloomy Future of Political Parties in Pakistan

20 دسمبر، 2013

I once got a chance to attend a sem­i­nar in Sha­heed Zul­fiqar Ali Bhut­to Insti­tute of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy (SZABIST) orga­nized by a youth based orga­ni­za­tion, the top­ic being “Is our Future Pos­i­tive or Not”. The pro­ceed­ings went some­thing like this; young par­tic­i­pants at the event were bom­bard­ing the guest politi­cian for the fail­ures of gov­ern­ment, the host of the show was con­stant­ly cov­er­ing him up, the bureau­crat was giv­ing ratio­nal answers, while the rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the uni­ver­si­ty was opti­mistic in his talk. I also some­how got the chance to speak but was silenced in mid-way. Per­haps my ques­tion was tak­ing too much of time and was also deemed uncom­fort­able by the offi­cials. As I sus­pect­ed, I got a total­ly awry and sense­less answer from the politi­cian. Today I think I should re-express my thoughts and I leave it up to the read­er either to fal­si­fy me or take my thoughts jus­ti­fied.

In my ques­tion, I came up with the notion that to me the future of Pak­istani youth is bright, and so is the future of Pak­istani uni­ver­si­ties, bureau­cra­cy and media. But the future of polit­i­cal par­ties of Pak­istan seems dark and gloomy. This opin­ion was based on what I heard from rep­re­sen­ta­tives of four main­stream polit­i­cal par­ties present at the occa­sion.

Our polit­i­cal par­ties lack such insti­tu­tion­al­iza­tion of train­ing and capac­i­ty build­ing for their work­ers. The lead­er­ship in polit­i­cal par­ties is most­ly based on plu­toc­ra­cy while the exist­ing mech­a­nisms for gen­er­at­ing mem­ber­ship are hope­less.

Well’ that’s not just all. As far as I under­stand, our polit­i­cal par­ties have the acute dearth of lead­er­ship and its suc­ces­sion as well as poor capac­i­ty devel­op­ment set­up. Any orga­nized group of indi­vid­u­als who believe in con­tin­u­ous devel­op­ment, have to set goals on short, mid and long terms basis. I won­der why our polit­i­cal par­ties fail to do so!

We do wit­ness an encour­ag­ing num­ber of young peo­ple engag­ing in com­mu­ni­ty devel­op­ment. They gen­er­ate cred­i­ble expe­ri­ence through attend­ing train­ing work­shops and oth­er group activ­i­ties. Uni­ver­si­ties have their own devel­op­men­tal pro­grams and var­i­ous train­ing pro­grams by High­er Edu­ca­tion Com­mis­sion. Sim­i­lar­ly our bureau­cra­cy has the Nation­al Insti­tu­tion of Man­age­ment (For­mer­ly NIPA – Nation­al Insti­tute of Pub­lic Admin­is­tra­tion) and Civ­il Ser­vice Acad­e­my in Lahore.

But on the oth­er hand our polit­i­cal par­ties lack such insti­tu­tion­al­iza­tion of train­ing and capac­i­ty build­ing for their work­ers. The lead­er­ship in polit­i­cal par­ties is most­ly based on plu­toc­ra­cy while the exist­ing mech­a­nisms for gen­er­at­ing mem­ber­ship are hope­less. It has been observed that accord­ing to stan­dard prac­tice, any­one could walk in a par­ty office and become a mem­ber just by fill­ing out a mem­ber­ship form. There is no sys­tem in place for mea­sur­ing the cred­i­bil­i­ty and capa­bil­i­ty of a poten­tial mem­ber. A cer­tain polit­i­cal par­ty has indeed made it a joke that one could join the par­ty just by reply­ing to an SMS. Should there be no cri­te­ria for becom­ing the mem­ber of a polit­i­cal par­ty?

Com­ing back to the train­ing and devel­op­ment part, some polit­i­cal par­ties do pro­vide var­i­ous kinds of oppor­tu­ni­ties to their mem­bers for mass mobi­liz­ing and pub­lic speak­ing. This kind of train­ing sure­ly makes their work­ers fire­brands but do they know what good gov­er­nance is? Do they under­stand the nuances of polit­i­cal issues and that of lead­er­ship? The only com­pet­i­tive train­ing that polit­i­cal par­ties receive is from few NGOs. But such for­eign fund­ed orga­ni­za­tions are sure­ly not self-sus­tain­ing. They are doing a good job but when the aid ends the capac­i­ty build­ing would also come to a halt.

A can­di­date for some polit­i­cal office should deem it like this: he/she is ask­ing for a job while the whole con­stituen­cy is the inter­view­er.

The youth, at least the one I am refer­ring to and the likes of those attend­ing the sem­i­nar I men­tioned above, seem well aware of their rights. They have a sound know-how of devel­op­men­tal frame­work, most prob­a­bly gained through train­ings from var­i­ous NGOs and aca­d­e­m­ic ini­tia­tives. I would like to ask how many par­ty work­ers of the rul­ing par­ty know about the Mil­len­ni­um Devel­op­ment Goals, a pri­ma­ry cause for which our coun­try is get­ting aid for devel­op­ment but which are actu­al­ly spent on par­ty cam­paigns. I am sure only a hand­ful of them would be aware of it. So far the key train­ing and prac­ti­cal edu­ca­tion that our politi­cians receive is after they become par­lia­men­tar­i­ans, again thanks to a hand­ful of train­ing insti­tu­tions and NGOs. Isn’t it unfor­tu­nate that only after becom­ing an MPA or MNA, our politi­cians get to learn about gov­er­nance and relat­ed issues?

So, what’s the solu­tion? To start with, the old ways of pol­i­tics must be got­ten rid of. Instead of increas­ing their per­son­al influ­ence, the politi­cians should focus more on real time devel­op­ment. The activists and mem­bers of polit­i­cal par­ties should go through exten­sive train­ings. There are already many pro­grams ini­ti­at­ed by var­i­ous non-gov­ern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions. These pro­grams should be ben­e­fit­ted from to the max­i­mum lev­el. More inno­v­a­tive pro­grams for inter­nal capac­i­ty build­ing should be ini­ti­at­ed by the polit­i­cal par­ties them­selves which should focus on issues of polit­i­cal phi­los­o­phy, com­mu­ni­ty devel­op­ment, project man­age­ment, strate­gic man­age­ment and human devel­op­ment. This way, when ques­tioned regard­ing capa­bil­i­ty, the polit­i­cal par­ties should be able to answer with evi­dence.

Our politi­cians must real­ize that Pak­istani youth is now empow­ered and aware. A can­di­date for some polit­i­cal office should deem it like this: he/she is ask­ing for a job while the whole con­stituen­cy is the inter­view­er. Apart from pop­u­lar sup­port, they bet­ter have cred­i­ble edu­ca­tion and expe­ri­ence on their Cur­ricu­lum Vitae and if they fail to do so, then our par­ties are doomed. And nei­ther the rhetoric of big names nor the promise of new-come hered­i­tary lead­er­ship will be able to save them.

7 Responses

  1. Well, I have few dis­agree­ments as far as your argu­ment is con­cerned. I believe, no orga­ni­za­tion (NGO and train­ing) could fill the vac­u­um which you men­tioned as lead­er­ship cri­sis.
    Our uni­ver­si­ties lack the basic and fun­da­men­tal aspect which is ‘Stu­dent Union’. Stu­dent union is itself an acad­e­my which trains and grooms stu­dents for coun­try’s pol­i­tics, it includes every­thing speak­ing, knowl­edge, even rhetoric. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, our uni­ver­si­ties (pub­lic) have stu­dent wings of polit­i­cal par­ties which are in pow­er or had been in pow­er. What we need to do that we should train our stu­dents at uni­ver­si­ty lev­el. In order to do so, we have to form stu­dent union at col­lege and uni­ver­si­ty lev­el and depoliti­cize stu­dent wings.

  2. Andeel Ali
    I can Not Under­stand your Argu­ment because it is so con­fus­ing… In My Point of View … You are failed to prove your Notion

    As You said:
    I came up with the notion that to me the future of Pak­istani youth is bright, and so is the future of Pak­istani uni­ver­si­ties, bureau­cra­cy and media. But the future of polit­i­cal par­ties of Pak­istan seems dark and gloomy

    But you have not giv­en con­crete argu­ments & Evi­dences about the fail­ure of polit­i­cal sys­tem in Pak­istan
    Where … i Total­ly agree with the Com­ment of Jaf­fer Abbas Mirza about Stu­dents’ Unions

    Now I want to Ask Few Ques­tions:

    1) Stu­dents Union have been Restore by super­eme court of Pak­istan in 1979 .… But No imple­men­ta­tion till yet Why …Who is behind this ??

    2) You have not men­tion the role of Army & secret agen­cies in Polit­i­cal dis­as­ter .… Even you have not men­tion Three Mar­shal Law Peri­ods in Pak­istan … Do you think it has not made any impact on polit­i­cal groom­ing ??

    3) You have not made any com­ment about role of Biased Media .. May I men­tion here the series of Mubashir Luq­man’s pro­gram against Geo TV… May I men­tion the series of pro­grams on Waqt News about the Account­abil­i­ty of Jour­nal­ists .… May I men­tion the pro­gram f Kashif Abbasee & Talat Hus­sain in which they were total­ly agree that many of the Anchors are involved in ful­fil­ing the paid agen­da of Polit­i­cal par­ties & agen­cies … In short I con­clude that Plot­i­cal sys­tem can not flour­ish with­out strong & “UN-BIASED” Role of Media … Train­ing of Jour­nal­ists are more impor­tant than Train­ing of Polit­i­cal work­ers…!!

    4)You have not men­tion the role of Biased Judi­cia­ry .. May I men­tion “Nazariya-e-Zaroorat” by supreme court.. May I men­tion that 30 Lac Cas­es of COMMON men are still pend­ing in Super­eme court at the depar­ture time of Mr Iftikhar Chaudhry .… Who will pro­vide Jus­tice to Peo­ple of Pak­istan … Anoth­er Thing .. Judi­cia­ry ONLY can take deci­sions as per exist­ing law … They have no right of leg­is­la­tion … In Short I con­clude That … Our Judi­cia­ry have been involved in POWER Game spe­cial­ly since last 10 years and With out a Strong Judi­cial Sys­tem … Polit­i­cal sys­tem can not get strong and Fruit­ful …!!!

    5 ) You Have not Men­tion the Role of “Nation­al­ists” & “Reli­gious Par­ties” … Who Are Work­ing for Inter­na­tion­al Agen­da just for their Small Ben­e­fits …!!

    I Just want That You Have to Men­tion All These Facts …& then Con­clude with a bet­ter Argu­ment…!!

    Jazak-ALLAH

  3. Dear Abid Ali,

    This is a blog arti­cle not a schol­ar­ly research arti­cle in which he can define every­thing in detailed. I agree with your some points but dis­agree with some at the same time.
    You can’t blame media and judi­cia­ry. They have noth­ing to do with stu­dent union. One has to under­stand that this lead­er­ship cri­sis is the result of absence of stu­dents union in our uni­ver­si­ties.
    You talked about nation­al­ists and reli­gious par­ties but you did­n’t talk about those polit­i­cal par­ties who have mil­i­tant wings. These polit­i­cal and reli­gious par­ties are the obsta­cles for stu­dent union in pub­lic col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties.
    By the way, you were the min­is­ter dur­ing Mushar­raf era? Phr b army k liye shikay­at.

  4. Dear Jaf­fer Sahab
    Aadaab
    .
    You Wrote:
    “You can’t blame media and judi­cia­ry. They have noth­ing to do with stu­dent union.”
    Sir
    But Media And Judi­cia­ry Have it’s role in Polit­i­cal Sta­bil­i­ty which is the main cap­tion of this blog.…. But Unfor­tu­nate­ly our media and judi­cia­ry … Both Are Biased, Cor­rupt And Self Cen­tered .… That’s Why I Crit­i­cized them …!!!

    You Also Wrote:
    “You talked about nation­al­ists and reli­gious par­ties but you didn’t talk about those polit­i­cal par­ties who have mil­i­tant wings.”

    My Dear
    Plz Name Only One Par­ty, Which Has Not It’s Mil­i­tant Wing … Less or More … But Every­one Has it’s Mil­i­tant Wing … Even The So Called Insaf Par­ty Also Has It .. (As Per Report of DG Rangers, Which Was Pre­sent­ed in Supreme Court) … And Will You Pleas Reply Me That Why These Mil­i­tant Groups are made for ?

    In The Last
    You Wrote:
    “you were the min­is­ter dur­ing Mushar­raf era? Phr b army k liye shikay­at.…

    Yes I Was … But It Does Not Mean That I will Sup­port all their ille­gal Acts too … No & Nev­er …

    By The Way … Can You Deny the role of army in Desta­bi­liz­ing the polit­i­cal atmos­phere in coun­try ?

    I will Wait Ur Reply
    Regards
    Abid Ali Umang

  5. i don’t agree with you. you should come out and see the things prac­ti­cal­ly. you said NGOs play­ing vital role but many of them doing de-polit­i­calised our system.you can see plu­toc­ra­cy in every polit­i­cal par­ty of the world this is by prod­uct of this bru­tal system.the issues you have men­tioned actu­al­ly they r not,for you there is much more to know. best of luck

  6. Dear Abid Sahib,

    If you mean that our judi­cia­ry and estab­lish­ment pro­mot­ed right-wing par­ties, then I agree with you. As far as media is con­cerned, we are liv­ing in cor­po­rate world so one can not expect any­thing from these cap­i­tal­ists (media own­ers). How­ev­er, I still believe that we can not blame judi­cia­ry and media for the absence of stu­dent unions.They have noth­ing to do with it.

    Nation­al Stu­dent Fed­er­a­tion does­n’t have mil­i­tant wing. How­ev­er, it is small and re-emerg­ing par­ty. As far as your ques­tion is con­cerned, the sim­ple answer is, they are made for coer­cion.

    With due respect, I real­ly don’t under­stand that what’s the def­i­n­i­tion of ide­ol­o­gy, democ­ra­cy and dic­ta­tor­ship in MQM. Ide­o­log­i­cal­ly, it is vague and con­fused or one can say oppor­tunist because we have enor­mous exam­ples, you (par­ty) were part of gov­ern­ment whether it was democ­ra­cy or dic­ta­tor­ship.
    No one can deny the role of army in our pol­i­tics. It is the dilem­ma in post-colo­nial states that army has always influ­ence in pol­i­tics.

    Best regards,
    Jaf­fer A. Mirza

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 Responses

  1. Well, I have few dis­agree­ments as far as your argu­ment is con­cerned. I believe, no orga­ni­za­tion (NGO and train­ing) could fill the vac­u­um which you men­tioned as lead­er­ship cri­sis.
    Our uni­ver­si­ties lack the basic and fun­da­men­tal aspect which is ‘Stu­dent Union’. Stu­dent union is itself an acad­e­my which trains and grooms stu­dents for coun­try’s pol­i­tics, it includes every­thing speak­ing, knowl­edge, even rhetoric. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, our uni­ver­si­ties (pub­lic) have stu­dent wings of polit­i­cal par­ties which are in pow­er or had been in pow­er. What we need to do that we should train our stu­dents at uni­ver­si­ty lev­el. In order to do so, we have to form stu­dent union at col­lege and uni­ver­si­ty lev­el and depoliti­cize stu­dent wings.

  2. Andeel Ali
    I can Not Under­stand your Argu­ment because it is so con­fus­ing… In My Point of View … You are failed to prove your Notion

    As You said:
    I came up with the notion that to me the future of Pak­istani youth is bright, and so is the future of Pak­istani uni­ver­si­ties, bureau­cra­cy and media. But the future of polit­i­cal par­ties of Pak­istan seems dark and gloomy

    But you have not giv­en con­crete argu­ments & Evi­dences about the fail­ure of polit­i­cal sys­tem in Pak­istan
    Where … i Total­ly agree with the Com­ment of Jaf­fer Abbas Mirza about Stu­dents’ Unions

    Now I want to Ask Few Ques­tions:

    1) Stu­dents Union have been Restore by super­eme court of Pak­istan in 1979 .… But No imple­men­ta­tion till yet Why …Who is behind this ??

    2) You have not men­tion the role of Army & secret agen­cies in Polit­i­cal dis­as­ter .… Even you have not men­tion Three Mar­shal Law Peri­ods in Pak­istan … Do you think it has not made any impact on polit­i­cal groom­ing ??

    3) You have not made any com­ment about role of Biased Media .. May I men­tion here the series of Mubashir Luq­man’s pro­gram against Geo TV… May I men­tion the series of pro­grams on Waqt News about the Account­abil­i­ty of Jour­nal­ists .… May I men­tion the pro­gram f Kashif Abbasee & Talat Hus­sain in which they were total­ly agree that many of the Anchors are involved in ful­fil­ing the paid agen­da of Polit­i­cal par­ties & agen­cies … In short I con­clude that Plot­i­cal sys­tem can not flour­ish with­out strong & “UN-BIASED” Role of Media … Train­ing of Jour­nal­ists are more impor­tant than Train­ing of Polit­i­cal work­ers…!!

    4)You have not men­tion the role of Biased Judi­cia­ry .. May I men­tion “Nazariya-e-Zaroorat” by supreme court.. May I men­tion that 30 Lac Cas­es of COMMON men are still pend­ing in Super­eme court at the depar­ture time of Mr Iftikhar Chaudhry .… Who will pro­vide Jus­tice to Peo­ple of Pak­istan … Anoth­er Thing .. Judi­cia­ry ONLY can take deci­sions as per exist­ing law … They have no right of leg­is­la­tion … In Short I con­clude That … Our Judi­cia­ry have been involved in POWER Game spe­cial­ly since last 10 years and With out a Strong Judi­cial Sys­tem … Polit­i­cal sys­tem can not get strong and Fruit­ful …!!!

    5 ) You Have not Men­tion the Role of “Nation­al­ists” & “Reli­gious Par­ties” … Who Are Work­ing for Inter­na­tion­al Agen­da just for their Small Ben­e­fits …!!

    I Just want That You Have to Men­tion All These Facts …& then Con­clude with a bet­ter Argu­ment…!!

    Jazak-ALLAH

  3. Dear Abid Ali,

    This is a blog arti­cle not a schol­ar­ly research arti­cle in which he can define every­thing in detailed. I agree with your some points but dis­agree with some at the same time.
    You can’t blame media and judi­cia­ry. They have noth­ing to do with stu­dent union. One has to under­stand that this lead­er­ship cri­sis is the result of absence of stu­dents union in our uni­ver­si­ties.
    You talked about nation­al­ists and reli­gious par­ties but you did­n’t talk about those polit­i­cal par­ties who have mil­i­tant wings. These polit­i­cal and reli­gious par­ties are the obsta­cles for stu­dent union in pub­lic col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties.
    By the way, you were the min­is­ter dur­ing Mushar­raf era? Phr b army k liye shikay­at.

  4. Dear Jaf­fer Sahab
    Aadaab
    .
    You Wrote:
    “You can’t blame media and judi­cia­ry. They have noth­ing to do with stu­dent union.”
    Sir
    But Media And Judi­cia­ry Have it’s role in Polit­i­cal Sta­bil­i­ty which is the main cap­tion of this blog.…. But Unfor­tu­nate­ly our media and judi­cia­ry … Both Are Biased, Cor­rupt And Self Cen­tered .… That’s Why I Crit­i­cized them …!!!

    You Also Wrote:
    “You talked about nation­al­ists and reli­gious par­ties but you didn’t talk about those polit­i­cal par­ties who have mil­i­tant wings.”

    My Dear
    Plz Name Only One Par­ty, Which Has Not It’s Mil­i­tant Wing … Less or More … But Every­one Has it’s Mil­i­tant Wing … Even The So Called Insaf Par­ty Also Has It .. (As Per Report of DG Rangers, Which Was Pre­sent­ed in Supreme Court) … And Will You Pleas Reply Me That Why These Mil­i­tant Groups are made for ?

    In The Last
    You Wrote:
    “you were the min­is­ter dur­ing Mushar­raf era? Phr b army k liye shikay­at.…

    Yes I Was … But It Does Not Mean That I will Sup­port all their ille­gal Acts too … No & Nev­er …

    By The Way … Can You Deny the role of army in Desta­bi­liz­ing the polit­i­cal atmos­phere in coun­try ?

    I will Wait Ur Reply
    Regards
    Abid Ali Umang

  5. i don’t agree with you. you should come out and see the things prac­ti­cal­ly. you said NGOs play­ing vital role but many of them doing de-polit­i­calised our system.you can see plu­toc­ra­cy in every polit­i­cal par­ty of the world this is by prod­uct of this bru­tal system.the issues you have men­tioned actu­al­ly they r not,for you there is much more to know. best of luck

  6. Dear Abid Sahib,

    If you mean that our judi­cia­ry and estab­lish­ment pro­mot­ed right-wing par­ties, then I agree with you. As far as media is con­cerned, we are liv­ing in cor­po­rate world so one can not expect any­thing from these cap­i­tal­ists (media own­ers). How­ev­er, I still believe that we can not blame judi­cia­ry and media for the absence of stu­dent unions.They have noth­ing to do with it.

    Nation­al Stu­dent Fed­er­a­tion does­n’t have mil­i­tant wing. How­ev­er, it is small and re-emerg­ing par­ty. As far as your ques­tion is con­cerned, the sim­ple answer is, they are made for coer­cion.

    With due respect, I real­ly don’t under­stand that what’s the def­i­n­i­tion of ide­ol­o­gy, democ­ra­cy and dic­ta­tor­ship in MQM. Ide­o­log­i­cal­ly, it is vague and con­fused or one can say oppor­tunist because we have enor­mous exam­ples, you (par­ty) were part of gov­ern­ment whether it was democ­ra­cy or dic­ta­tor­ship.
    No one can deny the role of army in our pol­i­tics. It is the dilem­ma in post-colo­nial states that army has always influ­ence in pol­i­tics.

    Best regards,
    Jaf­fer A. Mirza

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *