Bernie Sanders – Laaltain

Hillary Clinton crushed Bernie Sanders in the latest round of primaries, not only in their home state of New York, but even the key eastern states of Maryland, Connecticut, Delaware and Pennsylvania. Sanders was only able to clinch the state of Rhode Island on Super Tuesday, but Clinton’s win in New York last week ended the Vermont Senator’s impressive winning streak where he claimed 7 states in a row in pitched primary battles since March. New York rewarded its Senator like it did in 2008 over Barack Obama, and Clinton has maintained a lead of 700 delegates over Sanders, with the Democratic Party convention around the corner in July.

New York rewarded its Senator like it did in 2008 over Barack Obama, and Clinton has maintained a lead of 700 delegates over Sanders, with the Democratic Party convention around the corner in July.

Even though Sanders has vowed to fight for the Democratic nomination ’till the last vote is cast’, Clinton has more or less secured the Democratic nomination. She has emerged as not only the Democratic party’s clear favourite to face off against the Republicans, but even the people’s choice.

With Trump poised to win the Republican nomination, beating Ted Cruz by sweeping the last 6 primaries, the conundrum now before the Democrats is whether they should prepare a united front ahead of the Presidential election in November, or let the bitter battle for the nomination continue.

The odds are stacked against Sanders even as he continues to push his popular ‘political revolution’ pitch. On paper, Sanders is the perfect Democratic poster boy, championing the party’s liberal politics for decades – not tied up by the strings of lobby groups and corporate interests. Clinton may not have a stellar record as a Democratic leader, with her flip-flops on the Iraq war, same sex rights, and a subdued campaign pitch on empowering the welfare state, but she has proven herself a political heavyweight. She has effectively exercised her public image and clout over Democratic voters, nourished over a long career from First Lady, Senator to Secretary of State. Clinton’s primary wins and delegate count show she is a lightning rod for the eclectic Democratic voter base, and has emerged as the party’s best candidate to retain control of the White House.

There’s no doubt that Sanders continues to hold sway over a major section of Democratic voters. However, with Trump’s positioning in the Republican Party, it may be pragmatic for Sanders to step back from a divisive campaign, cut the media jibes and attack ads in the run-up to the July convention.

Considering the tally of delegates, Sanders must realise that he has more to offer the Democratic Party and its social justice agenda by backing Hillary Clinton’s nomination for the Presidential ticket. By supporting Clinton, Sanders in no way will be waving the white flag as he has had a major influence on the overall Democratic campaign.

Sanders stressed on the need to tackle income inequality and highlighted his plans for immigration, banking and education reform, stirring Democratic voters across the United States. The campaign skyrocketed him as a strong contender for the nomination, and even pushed Hillary Clinton to re-align her narrative to reap the popularity of his social justice message. Even though he is miles behind in the race, Sanders has acted as a bridge between the Clinton campaign and Democratic voters, calibrating the party’s message to the sentiments and issues at the heart of its support base.

Sanders should now consider serving the Democratic Party as Clinton’s Vice Presidential candidate. The effect of his campaign has shown he is akin to a Birbal to Hillary’s Akbar, a force of truth and reason before the heir of the Democratic Party, keeping her true to its ideals. He should move to formalise that arrangement and end the friction between the two sides, to deter all voter fatigue and division in the Democratic ranks. The results of the primaries have clearly established that it is time for the Democrats to unite before the people of the United States, to become a more powerful ideological counter to the Trump led Republicans for what is set to be a no holds barred Presidential race.

As the US Presidential race heats up, two key ideological poles have emerged in the form of Senator Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Both candidates have framed an unconventional narrative on opposite ends of the political spectrum – one seemingly driven by conviction and the other by pure politics, but both challenging the status quo.

As the US Presidential race heats up, two key ideological poles have emerged in the form of Senator Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

Bernie Sanders is the longest serving independent senator in Congress and one of the few politicians actively aligned with the core base of American Democrats, who are disgruntled with the ‘Hope and Change’ promise of the Obama administration. He has been in public life for decades and has championed multiple social issues. Sanders was an activist during the civil rights struggle in the 1960s; as a student at the University of Chicago, he was an organiser for the Congress of Racial Equality and campaigned against segregation in public schools. He was part of the legendary March on Washington and one of the earliest champions of same sex rights at a time when the issue was political suicide. Sanders has a consistent progressive voting record, defending the manufacturing sector, campaigning for climate change awareness and supporting legislation to address income inequality.

Sanders supports the concept of universal healthcare; declaring it a fundamental human right, he is in favour of a ‘single payer system’, and aims to replicate the healthcare infrastructure of Australia and Canada in the United States. He was also one of the architects of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, a bill which sanctioned $5 billion for better healthcare for armed forces personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Sanders is also one of the architects of the Climate Protection Act of 2013, a bill which levies a carbon pollution fee on manufacturers, polluters and importers, diverting funds into green power technology. The senator is an ardent advocate of affordable higher education for American students, millions of whom face crippling debt from student loans. In fact, his most popular policy promise is increasing taxes for Wall Street and corporate America to fund higher education.

On the policy front, Sanders is the poster boy for Democratic voters, especially the younger demographic. A radical approach is the key difference between him and Hillary Clinton, the current front-runner, who has adopted a more calculating approach in the Presidential race. For Sanders, the policies he has championed for decades are the central issues in American politics today. His no-nonsense demeanour and rustic Brooklyn persona set him apart from Clinton, whose public image seems continuously ‘touched up’.

On campaign financing, Hillary Clinton has received millions from Wall Street via Super PACs while the majority of Sanders’ campaign is funded through public donations and support from multiple labour unions; Sanders has raised over $2 million through public donations and is closing in on Obama’s record from the 2012 elections. His appeal among Democratic voters is also driven by his effective use of social media to promote his policies and track record, in a nation where internet penetration is almost 90%. Consider the first Democratic debate: while the mainstream media gave the win to Hillary, social media gave the edge to Sanders, and he continues to dominate the political space on the web.

With Hillary Clinton there is the temptation of electing the first female US President, but Sanders is more of an activist than a politician. It seems the Democratic party’s mind is with Hillary, but its heart is with Sanders. Their national approval ratings are still neck to neck, but Sanders is ahead of Clinton according to the pre-poll survey of the first primary in New Hampshire, which goes to
the ballot in February. The result will be a crucial indicator of where the two leaders actually stand.

Then there’s Donald Trump, the front runner for the Republican nomination. He speaks his mind and has alienated multiple vote banks via his controversial statements. However, he has become a lightning rod for extreme-right Republican voters. Trump has called for a ban on Muslims entering the United States, he has called illegal immigrants from Mexico drug smugglers, criminals and rapists, and even said that tough gun laws contributed to the recent attacks in Paris. Trump seems to have come as a welcome relief to those Republican voters who have been aching to shed political correctness. His words seem to have empowered those who believe that immorality and savagery are rooted in certain cultures and that social security is only for ‘true Americans’. A Public Policy Polling survey of Trump supporters found that 66% of them believe that Obama is a Muslim, 61% believe he was not born in the United States and 63% favour amending the Constitution to end birth right citizenship. As Trump galvanises the far-right he remains far ahead of his competitors, as none of them have succeeded in consolidating the support of moderate Republicans.

Trump is a businessman and his approach to the elections is the same; it is how anyone who wants to storm into the national scene approaches politics. Trump has tailored a product after studying consumers and he is marketing it effectively. He doesn’t really believe that Muslims should be banned from the United States. He has extensive business ties in Muslim nations including Indonesia, UAE, Dubai, Qatar and Turkey, and even his business partners in these nations understand his strategy. The objective is simple: to win by any means possible. Just like the tagline of his show The Apprentice, ‘It’s nothing personal, it’s just business’

Trump has emerged bigger than the Republican Party, but he has damaged the party’s image as well. No matter how many times his competitors for the Republican nomination denounce him for his views, they are still unable to break his support base. The real estate magnate has pledged to spend around $1 billion on his Presidential campaign. He believes he is the most powerful man in the world and now he wants the world to realise it too.

Sanders and Trump are not traditional politicians. They are wild cards in their respective political arenas, one driven by principle and the other by the ambition to win. Support for both candidates is only rising as this election is becoming a clash of extreme ideologies. Conviction vs politics, virtue vs pandering, what will emerge as the stronger political force? This Presidential election will reveal the soul of 21st century America.