Laaltain

About Security Check Posts

23 ستمبر، 2014

A few days back a trag­ic inci­dent took place that was rem­i­nis­cent of a num­ber of sim­i­lar events where cit­i­zens lost their lives at ram­pant secu­ri­ty check posts.

This lat­est inci­dent took place in Peshawar in the posh area of Hay­atabad, in which a stu­dent of Uni­ver­si­ty of engi­neer­ing and Tech­nol­o­gy Peshawar lost his life. There are mul­ti­ple ver­sions of the sto­ry com­ing from dif­fer­ent sources. The secu­ri­ty offi­cials claim that the slain per­son failed to stop at the secu­ri­ty check post, while the sources on the victim’s side allege that the secu­ri­ty men were try­ing to kid­nap the stu­dent. The real­i­ty can only be ascer­tained after an impar­tial inves­ti­ga­tion about the whole episode.

The secu­ri­ty offi­cials claim that the slain per­son failed to stop at the secu­ri­ty check post, while the sources on the victim’s side allege that the secu­ri­ty men were try­ing to kid­nap the stu­dent.

How­ev­er what is more impor­tant to dis­cuss here is that why after more than a decade of domes­tic strife and the sub­se­quent law and order sit­u­a­tion, we are still unable to devise prop­er modus operan­di and pro­to­cols for an impor­tant issue such as the dai­ly rou­tine of pass­ing through secu­ri­ty check posts that are so ubiq­ui­tous in the coun­try.

There could be argu­ments to assert that since we are in a war like sit­u­a­tion, the worn out, under-pres­sure secu­ri­ty per­son­nel have no oth­er option but to shoot those who flee from secu­ri­ty check posts. It becomes more plau­si­ble in cas­es when the per­son flee­ing from the check post is a hot blood­ed young man.

But on the human side of the issue lies the argu­ment that what if the per­son is an inno­cent cit­i­zen who either inten­tion­al­ly (sup­pose an emo­tion­al non-abid­ing youth) crossed the post or could not under­stand the sig­nal of secu­ri­ty offi­cials. The lat­ter has hap­pened on a num­ber of occa­sions in the past. Even if it is a crime to dis­obey the state sanc­tioned orders but at the same time one always pon­ders that should such small aber­ra­tions be grant­ed death war­rants?

It is a com­plex conun­drum and a dilem­ma of sorts with­out any doubt. There is a del­i­cate bal­ance between the ground real­i­ties in which Pak­istan finds itself and the state’s respon­si­bil­i­ty of pro­tect­ing inno­cent human lives. But then one asks what is our gov­ern­ment doing to devise cer­tain mech­a­nisms to avoid such col­lat­er­al dam­ages as much and as best as it can?

Even if it is a crime to dis­obey the state sanc­tioned orders but at the same time one always pon­ders that should such small aber­ra­tions be grant­ed death war­rants?

For exam­ple ini­tial steps such as bring­ing uni­for­mi­ty in the secu­ri­ty rules across the coun­try and mak­ing cit­i­zens aware about them via mass media would be a good start. Every day we hear sto­ries of friends and acquain­tances telling us how they dealt with cops at the check post. Lis­ten­ing to any such sto­ry would expose the pro­fes­sion­al and eth­i­cal stan­dards of these men-at-arms. The cit­i­zens are left clue­less and con­fused in the midst of pletho­ra of secu­ri­ty require­ments that they have to deal with in a mul­ti­tude of sit­u­a­tions.

Rather than shoot­ing, a num­ber of less hor­ri­ble mea­sures could be tak­en such as aer­i­al warn­ings shots, shoot­ing at the tires of the vehi­cle, and oth­er warn­ing signs should be uti­lized before going for that last option of killing an ordi­nary cit­i­zen on the sus­pi­cion of being a ter­ror­ist.

Oth­er steps such as installing two check points at the same secu­ri­ty check post can also be tak­en, which is indeed already there in some parts of the coun­try. With this set­ting, even if a per­son who inten­tion­al­ly or unin­ten­tion­al­ly vio­lates the first check point could be whis­tled from behind by the guards and until he reach­es the sec­ond point of guards, he has some time to re-think about his action.

The issue at hand is a very com­plex one and the high­er ech­e­lon of our secu­ri­ty set­up includ­ing the gov­ern­ment must give it a seri­ous thought. We as ordi­nary cit­i­zens fail to com­pre­hend that how can some­one be grant­ed a death cer­tifi­cate with­out any chance mere­ly for not com­ply­ing with arbi­trary rules of the secu­ri­ty check posts.

As the war we are in has pro­longed, so should we have more effec­tive solu­tions to deal with such dilem­mas. As a first step, bring­ing this issue in the main­stream and dis­cussing it on var­i­ous forums could help in remov­ing the brew­ing sus­pi­cions and fears among the ordi­nary cit­i­zens of Pak­istan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *