Laaltain

Balochistan Dialogue

12 جولائی، 2012

Balochistan-DialoguesIn the con­text of grave sit­u­a­tion in Balochis­tan, Khu­di orga­nized a dia­logue engag­ing youth from Balochis­tan to dis­cuss the nuances of the prob­lem and to make their voic­es heard across the coun­try.

The event was attend­ed by a large gath­er­ing of youth most­ly from Balochis­tan and was chaired by Dr. Asim Saj­jad Akhtar, a promi­nent aca­d­e­m­ic for Quaid-e-Azam Uni­ver­si­ty. Speak­ers includ­ed Dr. Ishaq Baloch, senior vice pres­i­dent of Nation­al Par­ty of Balochis­tan; Saj­jad Hus­sain Changazi, a Haz­ara social activist from Quet­ta; and Imran Bazo­jai, a Pash­tun stu­dent leader from Balochis­tan.

In his intro­duc­to­ry remarks Dr Asim Saj­jad lament­ed that we have been ignor­ing the Balochis­tan issue for decades which has made things worse in the region. He was of the view that the Pak­istani state has always tried to sup­press the eth­nic, cul­tur­al and lin­guis­tic diver­si­ty in dif­fer­ent parts of the coun­try. The slo­gan of ‘one lan­guage, one nation’ great­ly dam­aged nation­al uni­ty so much so that it ulti­mate­ly led to the breakup of Pak­istan in 1971. The way out of this con­tra­dic­tion between nation­al and region­al iden­ti­ties is to accept the dif­fer­ences and diver­si­ty. He feared that the coer­cive sate poli­cies will yield hor­ri­ble results.

Dr. Ishaq Baloch empha­sized that in order to under­stand this com­plex prob­lem cor­rect­ly we need to look it in his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive objec­tive­ly. He opined that Pak­istan was not cre­at­ed in the name of reli­gion. Its cre­ation was in fact the result of denial of fed­er­al­ism in the unit­ed India as the auton­o­my of Mus­lim major­i­ty states was not accept­ed. He sug­gest­ed that we need a par­a­digm shift in the state poli­cies towards Balochis­tan if we have to resolve this prob­lem per­ma­nent­ly. The state will have to accept our eth­nic, lin­guis­tic and cul­tur­al iden­ti­ty. He also added that state vio­lence against Baloch nation­al­ists must stop now and Baloch peo­ple should be giv­en com­plete rights over their land and resources.

Saj­jad Hus­sain Changazi under­scored the need to have bet­ter com­mu­ni­ca­tion between dif­fer­ent eth­nic groups in Balochis­tan. He point­ed out that some ele­ments in the estab­lish­ment are try­ing to paint Balochis­tan issue as an eth­nic con­flict among Balochs, Pash­tuns and Haz­aras which is total­ly wrong.

He fur­ther added that more than 700 Haz­aras have been killed since 2000 and Lashk­er-e-Jhangvi, a mil­i­tant sec­tar­i­an out­fit, is respon­si­ble for the geno­cide of Shia Haz­ara. He chas­tised that the state is not doing enough to pro­tect Haz­ara com­mu­ni­ty form this bar­bar­i­ty.

Imran Bazo­jai said that Baloch and Pash­tun are the two major stake hold­ers in the province but the Pash­tuns have always been ignored in the debate on the issue. He high­light­ed that if Pak­istan is to sur­vive as a viable state then it must give auton­o­my to its provinces. He fur­ther said that Pash­tuns have always stood for rights of the Baloch and all oth­er sup­pressed groups and will con­tin­ue to do so in future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *